Multi-figure Composition as a Form of Dialogue in Portrait Painting: Historical Evolution, Theoretical Principles and Modern Interpretations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61993/2786-7285.2025.02.10Keywords:
multi-figure composition, portrait, dialogue, polyphony, communication, contemporary art, identity, chronotopeAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of multi-figure compositions in portrait painting as a universal and historically contingent form of visual dialogue. The object of the study is the group portrait in the context of its artistic, social, and communicative functions, while the subject is the visual dialogicity as a structural principle of compositional organization. The aim of the research is to identify the historical development, theoretical foundations, and contemporary interpretations of the multi-figure composition as a form of artistic communication. The methodology combines historical-artistic, phenomenological, and hermeneutic approaches, drawing upon Mikhail Bakhtin’s philosophy of dialogue, Hans Belting’s concept of the image as encounter, and Gernot Böhme’s aesthetics of atmospheres. The study applies comparative stylistic analysis and the principle of polyphonic reading of pictorial space. The article traces the historical development of the genre – from the harmonious ensembles of the Renaissance to the expressive scenes of the Baroque – and examines the transformation of multi-figure structures in Ukrainian modernism (M. Boichuk, T. Yablonska) and postmodern art (V. Sydorenko, O. Roitburd, I. Chychkan). Special attention is given to contemporary artists of the 2020s, including Zhanna Kadyrova, Alevtyna Kakhidze, and Oleksii Sai, who reinterpret the group composition through the lenses of social memory and digital communication. The scientific novelty of the research consists in conceptualising the multi-figure composition as a model of polyphonic thinking that unites character, space, and viewer within an ethical act of visual communication. The practical significance lies in the potential application of the findings to art education, curatorial practice, and interdisciplinary studies of visual culture.References
Kasianenko, K. M., Yankovska, L. Ye., & Sapko, S. Ye. (2021). Osoblyvosti ukrainskoho zhyvopysu u postmodernistskomu vymiri [Features of Ukrainian painting in the postmodernist dimension]. Art and Design, (3), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2021.3.7 [In Ukrainian].
Sydor-Hibelynda, O. (2008). Ukraintsi na Venetsiiskii biienale: sto rokiv prysutnosti [Ukrainians at the Venice Biennale: one hundred years of presence]. Nash Chas. [In Ukrainian].
Skliarenko, H. (2018). Suchasne ukrainske mystetstvo: konteksty, identychnosti, komunikatsii [Contemporary Ukrainian art: contexts, identities, communications]. ArtHuss. [In Ukrainian].
Stepovyk, D. (2011). Istoriia ukrainskoho mystetstva XX–XXI stolit [History of Ukrainian art of the 20th – 21st centuries]. Mystetstvo. [In Ukrainian].
Cherniavskyi, K. V., & Cherniavska, T. V. (2025). Evoliutsiia vizualnykh obraziv liudyny u suchasnomu tsyfrovomu mystetstvi [Evolution of visual images of humans in modern digital art]. Ukrainian Art Discourse, (1), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.32782/uad.2025.1.23 [In Ukrainian].
Baltaziuk, I. (2021). The Sacred in the symbols of Ukrainian Painting at the turn of the 21st century. Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 12(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.18290/rkult21122-9
Belting, H. (2011). An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body. Princeton University Press.
Berger, J. (2008). Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books.
Böhme, G. (2017). The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. Routledge.
Didi-Huberman, G. (2005). Confronting Images: Questioning the Ends of a Certain History of Art. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Heller, N. (2022). The Image as Encounter: Visual Dialogues in Modern Art. Yale University Press.
Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. 2nd ed. Routledge.
Honchar, K. (2023). The presentation of Ukrainian art in museum projects in Western Europe as part of the information struggle. Visual Culture of Ukraine, (1), 50–51. https://doi.org/10.62479/vcu.2023.01.050
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2015). Image Science: Iconology, Visual Culture, and Media Aesthetics. University of Chicago Press.
Pavlenko, L. (2024). Artistic Communication in Ukrainian Painting. ArtHuss.
Volska, S., Tiutiunnyk, I., Matsyshyna, Z., Datsiuk, N., & Krailiuk, L. (2025). Reflections on reality: Contemporary Ukrainian visual art and role in society. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI1), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.345
Zambrzycka, M., & Malej, I. (2024). Postmodern trends in Ukrainian art of the transformation period and the first decade of Independence. Slavia Orientalis, LXXIII (1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.24425/slo.2024.150661
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Костянтин Чернявський, Тамара Чернявська

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 149 / PDF downloads: 100
